EXCLUSIVE: The Interior and Commerce Departments are scrapping a sweeping Endangered Species Act (ESA) rule that officials say past administrations \u201cweaponized\u201d to block energy production, logging, infrastructure projects and private citizens\u2019 land use.
\nOfficials pointed to several ESA-listed species they say triggered undue or burdensome restrictions by treating habitat modification as potential \u201charm\u201d to protected species, purportedly expanding the ESA\u2019s \u201charm\u201d provision.
\n\u201cFor years, federal agencies abused the ESA to obstruct lawful land use and burden American families and businesses,\u201d Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told Fox News Digital.
\n\u201cThat approach turned routine activity into a regulatory trap, drove up costs that impacted people\u2019s lives, and expanded federal authority beyond what Congress intended.\u201d
\nBIDEN-ERA ENVIRO RULE ACCUSED OF STRANGLING TRUCKERS, SQUEEZING AMERICANS LANDS ON TRUMP CHOPPING BLOCK<\/p>\n
On Friday, the Interior and Commerce Departments announced they are rescinding the \u2018outdated\u2019 regulatory definition of \u2018harm\u2019 and returning the Endangered Species Act\u2019s interpretation to its original intent to end years of federal overreach.
\nThe administration is relying in part on the Supreme Court\u2019s 2024 decision in Loper Bright v. Raimondo, which overturned \u201cChevron deference\u201d and held that courts must use independent judgment when interpreting federal statutes rather than deferring to an agency\u2019s preferred reading of ambiguous law.
\nThe rule change therefore aims to align regulations with the \u201csingle best\u201d meaning of a statute rather than letting it be \u201ccontort[ed] to fit a political agenda,\u201d officials said.
\nLEGAL WAR ON TRUMP\u2019S AGENDA GAINS FIREPOWER AS FEDERAL LAWYERS DEFECT TO DEMOCRATS<\/p>\n
Officials pointed to the dunes sagebrush lizard, which the Biden administration listed as endangered in 2024, as an example of what they view as speculative habitat-based restrictions.
\nOfficials argued the change led to unnecessary restrictions on energy projects in Texas\u2019 lucrative Permian Basin, most recently depicted in the acclaimed Billy Bob Thornton series \u201cLandman.\u201d
\nUnder Section 9 of the ESA, it is unlawful to \u201ctake\u201d endangered wildlife, a term Congress defined to include actions such as harming, harassing, wounding or killing protected species.
\nTRUMP\u2019S ENERGY INITIATIVES MAY FINALLY EXTRACT AMERICA FROM MIDEAST CHAOS<\/p>\n
Federal materials tied the species\u2019 decline to surface-disturbing activities, including energy development and sand mining, which officials and industry representatives say can trigger costly permitting and compliance burdens.
\nOfficials also cited the lesser prairie-chicken, a grassland bird whose federal protections have drawn opposition from farmers, ranchers and energy developers across New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Colorado.
\nThe fight over habitat-based \u201charm\u201d dates back decades, including the northern spotted owl, whose 1990 ESA listing fueled a long-running battle over timber harvesting in the Pacific Northwest and was blamed for job losses.
\nA 2021 study in the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management estimated the owl\u2019s ESA listing reduced timber employment by roughly 16,000 to 32,000 jobs in the Pacific Northwest and northern California.
\nTimber interests and landowners challenged the federal definition, arguing that \u201charm\u201d should cover direct injury to wildlife, not habitat modification that indirectly affects a species.
\nThe Supreme Court ruled in favor of Clinton Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt in 1995, upholding a definition of \u201charm\u201d that included significant habitat modification when it actually kills or injures protected wildlife.
\nOfficials say the change is designed to narrow the regulation after Loper Bright and prevent agencies from using habitat-based theories to block lawful activity far beyond what Congress authorized.
\nThe agencies argued the previously broadened definition of \u201charm\u201d became an unlawful intrusion on private property rights.<\/p>\n
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick added that fishermen in particular have been burdened by the regulation for \u201ctoo long.\u201d
\nReturning the ESA to its original purpose protects both the environment and economic development, Lutnick said.
\nSIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER<\/p>\n
\u201cThis administration is committed to protecting wildlife using Gold Standard Science, the law and the tools Congress actually gave us,\u201d added U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Brian Nesvik. \u201cWe can protect species and respect communities at the same time.\u201d<\/p>\n
Administration officials stressed that core ESA protections remain in place, including prohibitions on directly injuring or killing protected wildlife.
\nThe administration said the change is intended to reduce permitting and compliance costs while providing greater legal clarity for landowners, energy producers and developers, advancing President Donald Trump\u2019s vision of domestic energy dominance and a regulatory state that works for, not against, the average American.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"