{"id":34247,"date":"2026-02-10T00:02:21","date_gmt":"2026-02-10T00:02:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/?p=34247"},"modified":"2026-02-10T00:02:21","modified_gmt":"2026-02-10T00:02:21","slug":"epstein-victims-use-super-bowl-commercial-to-pressure-pam-bondi-over-withheld-files","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/?p=34247","title":{"rendered":"Epstein victims use Super Bowl commercial to pressure Pam Bondi over withheld files"},"content":{"rendered":"

Numerous women urged Attorney General Pam Bondi in a high-profile Super Bowl ad on Sunday to release more files from Jeffrey Epstein\u2019s sex-trafficking cases, signaling their dissatisfaction with the Department of Justice\u2019s efforts to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
\nProminent Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., immediately elevated the ad, which came in the wake of the DOJ releasing more than 3 million pages of files and concluding its review.
\nSchumer shared a video of it on X, calling it \u2018the most important ad\u2019 of the day.
\n\u2018You don\u2019t \u2018move on\u2019 from the largest sex trafficking ring in the world. You expose it. #StandWithSurvivors,\u2019 Schumer wrote.<\/p>\n

Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., who has been leading Democrats\u2019 inquiries into Epstein matters in the House, shared a similar message.
\nThe women in the commercial conveyed their disapproval of the DOJ as the words \u2018Tell Attorney General Pam Bondi it\u2019s time for the truth\u2019 flashed across the screen.
\nThe commercial comes after the DOJ announced last month the release of more than 3 million pages from the case files. The department said it started with more than 6 million pages but withheld a major portion for a variety of reasons, including because the information could identify alleged victims or was protected by legal privileges.
\nThe omitted files led top supporters of the Epstein legislation, including Epstein\u2019s victims and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., to contend that the DOJ failed to comply with the transparency law.
\nThe DOJ has disputed that claim, saying its review was \u2018very comprehensive\u2019 and that it did not hide any information for the purpose of protecting President Donald Trump or other wealthy and politically connected people, including former President Bill Clinton, who were once friends with Epstein but were never accused of crimes associated with him.
\nMassie is among lawmakers who said they planned to visit the DOJ on Monday to review undisclosed files.
\nThe Super Bowl commercial was created by World Without Exploitation, a project of the Tides Center, a progressive nonprofit.<\/p>\n

It flashed images of several women holding photos of their younger selves and images of redaction marks, a nod to frustrations surrounding the DOJ heavily redacting some files while neglecting to redact names in others.
\n\u2018After years of being kept apart, we\u2019re standing together,\u2019 one of the women says. \u2018Because this girl deserves the truth.\u2019
\nThe department said it has moved swiftly to correct any redaction mistakes that have been brought to its attention.
\nThe DOJ did not respond to a request for comment on the commercial.<\/p>\n

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\"\"Numerous women urged Attorney General Pam Bondi in a high-profile Super Bowl ad on Sunday…<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":34248,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[230,1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34247"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=34247"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34247\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/34248"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=34247"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=34247"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/investmentbankingrules.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=34247"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}